Showing posts with label Sushmita Sen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sushmita Sen. Show all posts

Friday, January 18, 2013

MISS UNIVERSE 1994 – A LESSON IN HISTORY


THE RECURRING AND CONTINUING THEMES
 (Series 3 of 4)
By Rolando Rafael




In my Miss Universe history lessons in 1993, I suggested that had Miss Colombia answered with something about the children and the future she would have clinched the title instead of Miss Puerto Rico. In the 1994 edition, I cannot help but notice that the prevailing thoughts and aspirations of those times were of peace, children, education and the future. There was also a concern on environment albeit taken only sparingly.



On Peace:

 Sushmita Sen talked about multiculturalism of India and yet there is peace amongst its people of varied cultures, religions and languages during her preliminary interview. And on the Top 6 interview, Minorka Mercado of Venezuela answered in response to a question of Mona Grudt of what is the revelance of the Miss Universe pageant to woman at that time answered about peace. She said that Miss Universe is a way to send the message of love and peace to all humanity by bringing all the nations together in one pageant.



On Children:

In the last 2 pageants (1992 and 1993), Michelle Mclean and Dayanara Torres won their respective pageants with answers relating the children as the hope and the future themselves. In the preliminary interview of this years’ Top 10, Miss Switzerland tried to use this possible connection of her loving kids very much and thus she hoped to become a pediatrician someday and her concern is to support the needs of the children because they are the future. On the other hand, Miss Italy wants to become a teacher because she loves being with children, short of saying that they are the future of the world too.

On the other hand, Miss Slovak Republic cannot escape the topic about young people. Miss Slovak Republic’s discussion on the young as the hope of the future takes on a deeper as she talked about how she was part of the young people who made a mark on social change for her country. She said she joined street protests with other students to help liberate her country from the shackles of communism. She would rather again comeback on answering a question about women being unfulfilled if they do not have children. If at the outset during the preliminary interview she was a libertarian, she showed conservatism when she gave an answer that a woman should have children to become fulfilled and she looks forward to being one.

Even Sushmita Sen of India cannot help but take a dig on the issue about children. When she was asked a question by Florence LaRue on what was the greatest adventure she would embark upon if she had the means to do so? She remarked that it would be about children because she enjoys the adventure that comes with them.

On a related front, when Miss Colombia Carolina Gomez was asked during the Top 6 competition of the question what was the biggest problem facing young people, she retorted that it was the lack of security in them. In order to learn how to be secure, they should look up to the older generation because of the wisdom they have acquired through the years.  As such she is telling everyone that although the young is the future, they should learn from the experiences of the past.




On Education:
The issue on education seemed like a variant on the topic of the young as the future of the world. Take for example, Miss USA advocating Helping All Teens Survive in her program. In the same way, Miss Colombia talked about supporting young women. They talked about teenage and unwanted pregnancies and the need to educate them. Miss USA further stressed during the Top 6 interview that she would focus on disadvantaged kids and trying to make a difference in their lives. Don’t you think therefore that this is a variant in helping the kids to be more productive citizens of the world?



On the Environment:
Miss Sweden talked about the beauty of her place in Northern Sweden. She talked about the beauty of her surroundings, the northern lights, the midnight sun and the beauty of nature. She did a very nice description of her place of origin and we are just waiting for her to say that we must preserve it.

The Final Question:



What is the essence of a woman?

All three candidates to the Top 3 answered adequately and that anyone of them can be Miss Universe 1994. If we dissect the answers of the three, their answers revolved on 4 topics – Love, Children, Femininity and Motherhood. All the candidates talked about love for their children. Sushmita touched about love for their men too. They talk about giving birth to children, living their lives and the joys of motherhood. The winner therefore was the candidate that delivered the best spiel among them and that morning (night in other parts of the globe), the winner was Miss Sushmita Sen from India.

Final Note:

It seemed like the candidates for the Miss Universe 1994 edition had learned their lessons by watching previous pageants. They tried to go the way of peace, children, family, love and hope. However, they did not expect that there others who thought of the same route too. What mattered in the end is the crowning of the girl who had still one ace up in her sleeves.


Monday, January 30, 2012

INSIGHTS: BEAUTY FROM WITHIN

By Dominador Agbayani



It is such a surprise to hear a lot candidates during the Question and Answer portion when egged to answer to the question, “what edge do you have over other candidates for you to win this contest?” The candidates often answer, “I have beauty from within” without even trying to expound on their answers.

As one of the greatest philosophers of all time, Confucius has said: “Everything has its beauty but not everyone sees it.” We have different standards of beauty and it is not only based on physical characteristics and but something insightful and much deeper. In other words, the likeability of a person is shaped by our experiences, perceptions and the dictates of our upbringing. To quote further what Ruffa Gutierrez, Miss Philippines-World 1993 when she was asked how would she tell a girl suffering from low self-esteem to feel good about herself? She answered: "I would tell her to believe in herself because it is not only physical beauty that is important but also inner beauty. Just like what the Little Prince said, 'the essential things are invisible to the naked eye.' Definitely, character and personality are more important than physical beauty."
Miss Philippines World 1993, Ruffa Gutierrez during the final question and answer portion at Miss World 1993.

Definitely, everyone would want to become physically attractive. And definitely, the first basis in getting attracted to someone is through physical attraction. But eventually, in somebody’s search for someone really beautiful, they are gauged on their personality and reactions to certain situations to eventually ferret out the candidates’ beauty from within. Thus in the final analysis, the lady or woman who has the most beautiful face does not end up winning the plum because she was measured less in terms of her beauty from within.
Take for example, the Miss Universe Beauty Pageant, the girls are initially judged according to their beauty and physical attributes. They are measured according to their ability to carry themselves in bikini or in  bathing suits  as well as show elan in their evening gowns. But further, they are trimmed to the semi-finalists in their ability to respond to questions that would bring out how personable they are. They are not really judged based on how intelligent they are but how ready and witty they acquit themselves in bringing out the best in them during the interviews. In the recent Miss World Competition, the candidates participated in different events and they were rated based on their performances in those events. The candidates’ capability to espouse the agenda of the organization had the most bearing on who should win it all. On the other hand the Miss Earth Beauty Pageant is in search of someone who is not only beautiful but someone who can champion the cause of environmental preservation and protection.

Left to right: Miss Universe 1973 from the Philippines, Margarita Moran; Miss Universe 1994 from India, Sushmita Sen and Miss Universe 2002 from Russia, Oxana Fedorova (dethroned).

In the recent years, we notice that pageants go through a cycle. In the past, organizations look for pretty, intelligent and witty women. The 1990’s is the era where distortion of what is beautiful came about. The term “enhanced beauty” came to fore and many nations resorted to advances in cosmetic surgery and dermatology just to achieve the perfect beauty. Venezuela topped the list in creating such beauty and many nations followed suit. But if you notice the recent choices in most international pageants, the fresh, the seemingly untouched and natural beauties are beginning to be noticed again in the international arena. There is not steadfast rule therefore of what perfect beauty should be.
A beauty in one era may not be a beauty in someone else’s time. Beauty contests are still relevant and we cannot avoid it, physical attributes of a participant would still be the primary criterion in choosing the winner. The so-called beauty from within still remains to be the method in segregating the chaff from the grains.